Dockapps.org

 you are here: dockapps.org    dockapp details   categories | add dockapp | contact us | about 
wmgmail
wmdimp
wmDockApp
wmCube
minidock-0.1
ASBeats
WMeyes
WMnet
WMCPULoad

Category: System Monitoring
Rate it!
Current Rating Average: 8.00
Rate:   
Maintainer: nobody
Website: http://www.sh.rim.or.jp/~ssato/dockapp/index.shtml#wmcpuload
Description: A simple program to monitor CPU usage.

Screenshots:
wmcpuload-1.0.0.tar.gz wmcpuload-1.0.0.tar.bz2

Available Versions:
You are not the owner of this file version

Date Author Changelog Download Delete
2002-07-28 16:11:01 nobody not available wmcpuload-1.0.0.tar.gz
2002-07-28 16:16:19 nobody not available wmcpuload-1.0.0.tar.bz2

Add a new Version of this Dockapp

You may add a new (or even old) version of this dockapp by using the link above. This way we can be sure that this application will be available even if the project's homepage goes down (did that ever happen to you? :)).

User Comments

Nice one :)
posted by Adir Yakia (anonymous) - 2002-09-01 07:20:04

Its a very nice one :)
гы....
posted by [root] (anonymous) - 2002-09-07 07:32:20

russia - krasnoyarsk - linux rullleeezzzzzzz!!!!

KGTU - FIVT - rulleeeezzzzzzzzzz!!!!!!!

BT 22-4 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
fayn
posted by RAMM (anonymous) - 2002-10-15 17:27:13

hmm, good work :)
Good, but...
posted by Ken (anonymous) - 2003-05-06 08:50:57

I've used it a while, but now I have a dual cpu system. Perhaps support for dual cpu's should be added?
At a loss...
posted by eXq (anonymous) - 2003-07-26 03:49:38

Compiled without an error, and wmcpuload &, it's not ruuning without any type of error message.
I am running RHL 9, gcc-3.2.2-5, wmkaer-0.80.1
Any suggestions?
RHL9 ?
posted by Marcelo Silveira (anonymous) - 2003-08-28 23:06:11

change your linux system ! =)
No problem
posted by niqnm (anonymous) - 2003-09-26 21:36:48

me running on redhat 9,gcc-3.2.2-5, wmaker-0.80.2 without any problem. thanks to the author for this great dockapp.
?????????...
posted by init (anonymous) - 2003-10-30 21:26:03

Russia - krasnoyarsk - SibGAU rulez!!!
Dual CPUs
posted by Dmitri Nikulin (anonymous) - 2003-12-10 21:14:13

Ken:
wmcpuload --help

-c,--cpu which CPU is monitored (0, 1, ... )

You have to run one per CPU if you want multiprocessor 'support'... other CPU monitor support dual in one screen, but typically don't look as awesome as this one, and don't support the l33t alarm feature.
new version
posted by no_account (anonymous) - 2004-01-25 05:51:06

http://www.sh.rim.or.jp/~ssato/src/wmcpuload-1.0.1.tar.gz
problems with 2.6 kernel?
posted by irony (anonymous) - 2004-01-30 11:25:55

Running the 2.6 kernel, I get the error message: "Can't find cpu N!" or if I run it without specifying a cpu, it doesn't actually monitor anything.
Re: problems with 2.6 kernel?
posted by Seiichi SATO (logged user) - 2004-01-30 11:50:29

Could you send me your /proc/stat and 'uname -a' command results?

posted by Vino Fernando Crescini (logged user) - 2004-02-10 22:41:51

Using WMaker 0.80.1 (with manual window placement enabled) and WMCPULoad 1.0.1, starting wmcpuload without any parameters will still require manual window placement. Shouldn't it start as an icon as soon as it starts, regardless of whether the wm is configured for manual placement or not?

A bit annoying when wmcpuload is set to "start when window maker is started". When wm starts, an extra click is required to iconify wmcpuload.

workaround patch http://www.cit.uws.edu.au/~jcrescin/misc/wmcpuload-1.0.1-vino-1.diff"> here.

posted by Vino Fernando Crescini (logged user) - 2004-02-10 23:08:20

oops. here's that link again: http://www.cit.uws.edu.au/~jcrescin/misc/wmcpuload-1.0.1-vino-1.diff
Works great
posted by Brandon (anonymous) - 2004-05-28 11:39:14

on Debian woody. Ah nice.
Just a note
posted by Brandon (anonymous) - 2004-05-28 11:45:59

The man file installs in the wrong place (easily fixed) and you'll need libdockapp (Debian users: use apt-get)
Change color
posted by NighTiger (anonymous) - 2004-07-17 12:59:14

How can I change the colors?
tnx
Nice one!
posted by pras (anonymous) - 2005-04-02 05:56:38

It is really cool. Thanks!
Looks nice, but...
posted by Chris Craig (logged user) - 2005-04-28 16:35:29

I've found it greatly overstates the load - for example, sometimes when the load is < 20% (as shown by top) it reports 100%
pb on linux
posted by den (logged user) - 2007-10-09 14:27:48

On my system, cpu numbers in /proc/stat can be bigger that INT_MAX. unsigned int should be used in cpu_linux.c instead of int (that's what is used in the kernel to write the file).
pb on linux
posted by den (logged user) - 2007-10-09 14:32:41

On my system, cpu numbers in /proc/stat can be bigger that INT_MAX. unsigned int should be used in cpu_linux.c instead of int (that's what is used in the kernel to write the file).
Post your comments here!
Name:
Email:
Title:
Comment:

NOTE: Signup or login to post comments.
:: search & view ::

:: community ::

:: member profile ::

lsaul

:: active members ::
  • nobody
  • Thomas Nemeth
  • Jean-Philippe Guillemin
  • mattlaabs
  • Anthony Peacock
  • Alan Swanson
  • yokk
  • Draghicioiu Mihai
  • anomie
  • Jean-Luc Herren
    		•

    :: links ::
  • Window Maker
  • WMApp C++ Dockapp Graphics Library
    		•


    Generated in 0.5681 seconds